All is love in fair and war

Happy Anniversary East Taunton....one year gone by and still no trust land or casino.  When I think of Mayor Hoye and some (not all, well....only one) Taunton City Councilors, all I can think of is the Pepe Le Pew cartoon.  You know, that skunk who always fell in love with the cat who always seemed to wind up with a white paint stripe down her back....Pepe would see her and instantly fall in love....just like some certain city councilors did when Cedric Cromwell crossed their paths. Casino love at first sight...only difference is...this cat disguised itself on purpose and now thinks "playing hard to get" with the State will fill Cedric's empty wallet - it didn't work in Middleboro, Fall River or New Bedford....no problem - new stripe - new city.  Oh well, in the words of Pepe "all is love in fair and war".

I think this letter to the editor in the Taunton Daily Gazette is fantastic.  This was written by Frank Lagasse, another East Taunton resident who actually says it like it is...not what Cedric Cromwell would have you believe...and certainly no fake white stripe to have you believe what is not real.

Mashpee Wampanoag Land in trust application dishonest?  yep.....unlikely to succeed? oh yeah....even that fancy lawyer from Boston, with all his...ahem....revisionist history can't reverse the spin.  Oh...and did I mention that the Secretary of the Interior can't and won't put land in trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe because they were not under federal jurisdiction in 1934?  hmmmm...yep....so did Frank. 

Guest Opinion:  Mashpee casino bid dishonest, unlikely to succeed

We are now at the one year anniversary of the referendum that approved a tribal casino in East Taunton. Let’s discuss the developments since.

The tribe has submitted its land into trust application to the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Currently, it is incomplete as it lacks proof of aboriginal land claims to Taunton.The compact between the commonwealth and the tribe has been rejected by the Bureau of Indian Affairs as being, in part, usury.

A new compact, arguably just as usury as the first, is stuck in the Economic and Emerging Technologies Subcommittee at the Statehouse.KG Urban, a commercial casino developer, has filed suit in the First Circuit Federal Court.The Pokanoket Wampanoag Tribe has submitted an in-depth scholarly report challenging the Mashpee claim to Taunton.

The Massachusetts Gaming Commission has opened southeastern Massachusetts to commercial bidders. This includes bidders who may be denied a license in the other two regions of the state.

The Mashpee tribe is trying to establish aboriginal land claim to Taunton by claiming the female Sachem Wetamo was assassinated on the Taunton River and her head displayed on a pike on Taunton Green for 20 years.  A hijacking of Pokanoket land and heritage is being attempted. This is despicable. Wetamo was a Pokanoket. The Pokanoket have aboriginal claim to the Taunton area.

The Mashpees’ lawyer made this claim at the Economic and Emerging Technologies Subcommittee at the Statehouse during a public hearing on the second compact. If the second compact gets out of subcommittee and the Legislature approves it, there is a risk that the commonwealth will get no revenue from the tribal casino. Their chairman has threatened as much. If he’s such a wonderful partner, why would he issue threats? Why not follow through on his promises of partnership and friendship and compensate the commonwealth as a friend if the zero percentage part of the compact were to become effective?

The land-into-trust issue will not be resolved for years. On average, it takes seven years for the Department of Interior to make a decision on land-into-trust cases. And then there are numerous Supreme Court case decisions that must be overcome, adding many more years of indecision. And KG Urban’s Constitutional challenge will cause further delays. The Pokanoket will probably file suit. Neighbors may file suit. Opponents to the whole policy of land-into-trust will file suit.

There is no evidence that the Mashpees can use to claim a right to Taunton territory. There is, in fact, evidence that the Mashpees were never under federal jurisdiction. This is found in documents from the late 1930s and in a recent court case in 1977, when the Mashpees sued New Seabury for repatriation of land.

Commercial competition will most certainly cause competitive problems for the goal of a tribal casino. The revenue that a commercial casino will generate for the commonwealth will be at least 10 times what a tribal casino will generate. Why would our legislators allow such a low revenue stream from a tribal casino when a commercial casino would generate so much more revenue? In effect, we would be subsidizing a tribal casino by deferring the greater revenue from a commercial casino.

We are being played as fools. The disingenuousness, obfuscation, omissions of fact and carrot dangling must stop. Our state and community is being held hostage for the benefit of an entity that can not develop a casino. I beseech our Legislature to reject the compact in subcommittee for the benefit of our state and community.

Frank Lagace of East Taunton is an anti-casino activist.

"I am stupid. No?...Zee stripe! It is gone! She is not a skunk at all!"- Pepe Le Pew 

"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do." - William Blake
 
 - Be the Change  you want to see in the World -

Maximum Overdrive Cedric Style

Thank you (again) David Littlefield for reporting on the true news surrounding Cedric Cromwell's visit to the Taunton City Council Meeting....

HOLE IN THE LAND IN TRUST APPLICATION YOU COULD DRIVE A TRUCK THROUGH

These words being the most infamous words, and possible the words to his demise in a future in city government, were spoken by one of our city councilors when referring to the (IGA) intergovernmental agreement with the city of Taunton last year, who made this statement and then voted yes. So why bring this up a year later?? Let's see, Cedric Cromwell was sent a letter back in April to come before city council and update us on the proposed casino project. He was also asked to bring the LIT application to show us it is completed. Instead he brought with him a room full of tribe members, a bunch of lawyers, and some real cool drawings of a casino with moving cars and everything, and a graph chart showing the progress of the project as well as the progress with the federal government. What he neglected to bring was the completed LIT application. Still holding that close to your side, right Cedric?

So what is new about the project? Well, for starters the whole landscape and blueprints have significantly changed. Now the hotel/casino is 750 feet closer to Stevens street. Why this change? Because where the hotel/casino was originally situated, it was on top of wetlands. This now limits the spacious project of a worldwide destination resort casino to 60 feet off the road. Now I thought the picture of the casino with the moving traffic flow was great for a perfect world situation, of course. Clearly, Mr. Speller has not seen the traffic jams on 140/24 interchange during morning rush hours, nor has he seen the traffic on rt. 24 from the north side from 4 to 7 pm. If he had, he would have had the traffic flow to a complete stop. But then there would be nothing cool about that part of the presentation. Now what about Carcieri? You know that little legal decision that is one big hurdle for the tribe.

In enters Penny Coleman, big wig lawyer formerly from the Dept. of Interiors National Gaming Commission. She is the answer to a Carcieri Fix? Not likely. When asked how the tribe will get around Carcieri, her reply was simple and truthful. She had the dead stare of a deer in the headlights and replied "I do not know" then quickly passed it off to another of the many lawyers. She does not know because she only wrote Lands Opinions for gaming on lands that were already in trust, which the Mashpee's do not and cannot have. So, I would have to say there's more of your Malaysian dollars going to waste, Cedric. It seems it comes down to nothing new to see here folks, just a bunch of smoke and mirrors, with highly paid lawyers, architects, and slide shows. But there is still no LIT application.

Well I have the application for Land In Trust via a FOIA (freedom of information act.) request. It took a while to get, as the tribe blocked the request for over 40 days. I wonder why they would block such a request when they claim they are being so transparent. Aren’t we still partners? Well I guess I don't have to tell you, it is not completed. When and if it ever is completed, it will surely be rejected by the Dept. of Interior. On Wednesday, May 15th, the very next day after the Taunton meeting, I was at the State House giving testimony in front of the Senate Hearing Committee for the state compact. Again Cedric and crew showed up and filled the room, and left right after his presentation of course. Very interesting presentation made by the Mashpee's including "the historian" Jessie Baird, who paints a sad picture of how the Mashpee claim the Taunton lands. She even got the Chairwoman Canderas dropping a tear from her eye.

Jessie starts out talking some language I have never heard before. I felt like I was in the middle of a Star Wars movie, you know the scene where they are at the local night club, I mean all we were missing were subtitles.

Then she goes into the historical ties. It seems sometime in the 1800’s an Indian woman, Weetamoe, was crossing the Taunton River, she gets captured and beheaded, and her head is put on a stick and left in what we now call the Taunton Green. So this is the historical tie? I am telling you folks, you just can't make this stuff up!! My question to that is, why did the tribe go to Middleboro, then Fall River, looked at land in Plymouth and finally come to Taunton? What's the matter Cedric you thought Tauntonians were uneducated? You think we’re buying that story? No I don’t think so.

There you have it folks, there are so many holes in this Land In Trust application you surely could drive a truck through it. Cedric Cromwell can fool the local people, he can even fool the state people as well, what he cannot fool is the federal level He cannot because they know this tribe does not qualify for Land In Trust and the federal level knows we are watching them. The Mashpee's bought their federal recognition to the tune of 15 mil. No one was paying attention. But they won't buy Land In Trust because we are paying very close attention. The old saying you can fool some of the people some of the times, but you can't fool all of the people all the time. See you in Washington, Cedric.

I desire no future that will break the ties of the past - George Elliot

 

The supreme quality for leadership is unquestionably integrity. Without it, no real success is possible, no matter whether it is on a section gang, a football field, in an army, or in an office. - Dwight D. Eisenhower
- be the change you want to see in the world -

 



Another Open Letter to Cedric Cromwell....

Dear Cedric,

You can tout your rhetoric "we were under federal jurisdiction in 1934" fantasy all you want....you can even convince naïve journalists to write articles in supporting your claims...heck, you can hire a pseudo tribal member via marriage as your PR cheerleader to air commercials full of lies and innuendo...I'm fine with that. Heck, I am tickled pink thinking about the fact that you paid under-educated, LIT inept fancy lawyers to write up yet a third Carcieri argument to get land in trust. In fact, we are honored that our meek, timid, IN YOUR FACE letter to the SOI, BIA and State of Massachusetts regarding your (ahem) federal jurisdiction status as of 1934 forced you to write a rebuttal letter...really, we are...it was super fun finding the evidence, yet even more exciting that it left your overpaid PR "tribal member by marriage" person speechless. Here is your problem Cedric...maybe, just maybe...if you knew ANYTHING about the history of the Tribe you claim to lead, you would have actually read your Federal Recognition first...you know...before sending yet another Carcieri argument about federal jurisdiction.  If you had, you would have realized that the tribe you claim to lead submitted evidence to the federal government in support of tribal existence, is in complete contradiction to your claims....  behold paragraph one, page 23 of the Mashpee Wampanoag Federal Recognition entitled: Federal Officials, Academics, and Researchers

(verbatim)

"Federal officials, academics, and various researchers consistently described the Mashpee in the 1930's and 1940's. In 1934, W. Carson Ryan, Jr., an official with the Bureau of Indian Affairs,* wrote James F. Peebles, superintendent of schools in Bourne, Massachusetts, regarding Federal assistance for building a school in the "Indian town of Mashpee." Ryan, writing at the behest of Eleanor Roosevelt informed Peebles that Federal grants for school construction were unavailable for "Indian groups" like the "Mashpee Community" under State jurisdiction."

* emphasis mine...
 

 Oh...and your claims regarding Mashpee children going to the Carlisle School is contradicted in your Federal Recognition also....just so you know.....

Kindest Regards,

Citizens of Region C who know you are up to your eyeballs in bulls**t...xoxo

 -The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic - John F. Kennedy

 I believe that it is better to tell the truth than a lie. I believe it is better to be free than to be a slave. And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant. - H. L. Mencken -

- be the change you want to see in the world -

 

 

Yin and Yang

This little spoken truth has a moral that says it all...Honestly, Cedric Cromwell really should read this and then take some time to meditate on what is really important to him....from his actions lately, it is not the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe or what is best for "his" people...only what is best for him.  He is feeding the wrong wolf.

Leadership is a privilege to better the lives of others. It is not an opportunity to satisfy personal greed - Mwai Kibaki

- be the change you want to see in the world -

Open Letter to Cedric Cromwell

Here is an open letter to Cedric Cromwell in response to his statements made in a Taunton Gazette article released this morning....

Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Chairman Cedric Cromwell is continuing a media blitz in advance of an expected Massachusetts Gaming Commission vote, vowing Monday that the tribe will build a casino in Taunton.

“Threats to sue our Tribe, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the Department of the Interior will not deter us from building a first class destination resort casino in Taunton,” Cromwell said in a statement. “We have known all along that different groups would sue to try and deprive us of our tribal rights, but it has become clear that our opponents are more concerned with their own self-interest than the good of Southeastern Massachusetts. All they are doing is lining the pockets of lawyers instead of working to fill the pockets of the good people of Southeastern Massachusetts who need work.”

comment to the Taunton Gazette -  really?? the fact that you print this trash shows that your reporters have no clue about anything regarding LIT , could care less about the ramifications of trust land in your community, or the federal process for land in trust....you don't get it at all - if you did - you might have taken the time to look into Cedric's pathetic claims at painting opponents as "depriving the tribe of their tribal rights to obtain trust land" in a town they have never had any claim to until they decided to try and build a casino there"...shame on you!

boo-freaking-hoo Cedric....your lies and twisting of facts is just disgusting and no one...I mean no one who knows anything about the federal trust land process is buying it. Especially not David Littlefield, East Taunton resident and number one opponent to your lies...here is what he has to say about that...

EAST TAUNTON RESIDENTS FIRM OVER FIGHT FOR NO TRIBAL CASINO IN SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

While the chairman of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Cedric Cromwell continues his desperate, feeble attempts with a media blitz, to threaten the Mass Gaming Commission before their vote on Thursday on whether or not to open region C to commercial bidders. He has finally realized that his fairy tale dream of having a casino anywhere may never come to fruition. In his statement to the Taunton Gazette "threats to sue our tribe, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Department of the Interior will not deter us from building a first class destination resort casino in Taunton". Well Cedric, there are a few problems with that statement you made. First of all we would not sue the tribe. The tribe has never been under federal jurisdiction, and this is proven in documents that show the BIA did not ignore you, or pass you by, but did in fact, on several occasions, refuse to intervene and help your tribe because the federal government declared the Mashpee Wampanoag were state citizens, in fact the BIA just recently declined to help the Mashpee Wampanoag with the fraudulent elections back in February of this year. So, for centuries the BIA and the DOI have and still do consider the Mashpee Wampanoag state citizens who are not, nor ever have been, under federal jurisdiction. We won't sue the Commonwealth of Massachusetts either. We have no desire to take any desperately needed funds from our state or the good people of southeastern Massachusetts. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts can only approve a compact for gaming, which by the way is completely different from getting land in trust, and without land in trust, the compact means nothing.  So to educate you a little further, we could sue the Department of the Interior if they were to break the law and over step their boundaries in granting a tribe that was never under federal jurisdiction land in trust. You cannot change history nor create new history. As far as lining the pockets of attorneys, and taking away money from the Commonwealth, yes, you are wrong again!! Per guidelines set by the BIA, your proposed casino project would only bring 6.25% to the Commonwealth, and if a commercial casino was already here (garnering the state 25%), and you continue your pursuit of a tribal casino as you have warned us you will do, the good people of southeastern Massachusetts will get 0%.  All the money will go to lining your pocket, the tribe and Malaysian investors, of course. If you bothered to stick around long enough to hear what the good people of southeastern Massachusetts have to say, you would understand that this dream of yours will never happen. But you don't stick around for those meetings, you run your usual same old speech, the same one you used in Middleboro and Fall River, and now Taunton,  while you continue to reservation shop. You say "self-interest" - I say self-preservation for my community that you stormed in on and tried to take control of. You know the old saying that you and Glen Marshall use from the tribal casino handbook "We’re coming, like it or not, so get the best deal you can" well the best deal for Taunton would be for you to pack up and head on back down to Mashpee where your final determination by the federal government puts you. Oh yeah I forgot, Mashpee won't let you have a casino there either. You’re the one bullying the people of Taunton and the Gaming Commission. You’re the one threatening lawsuits if you don’t get the casino you mistakenly think is your inevitable right to have. You’re the one threatening to line lawyer’s pockets with the only money you have- Malaysian investors and the federal grant money. You’re the one not being transparent. By the way how’s that land in trust application working for you? You know the one you started in 2007 in Middleboro? Amended, rejected, refilled. I can't wait to see you when you come before the City Council the end of this month to answer our questions and show us the completed LIT application... so when your pocket lined lawyer says he will sue the Commonwealth for relief and remedies, does that mean YOU”RE going to take money from the good people of Southeastern Massachusetts? Bottom line, Cedric, to quote your lawyer "after 400 years of injustice and deprivation, the tribes obligation to its citizens requires no less” - what that really means is after 400 years of being told over and over again that the Mashpee Wampanoag are not under federal jurisdiction the tribe has no obligation…..Yes Cedric it is true, you and your tribe are state citizens just like me and all the other good people of Southeastern Massachusetts. I promised you a year ago that I would fight you through the local, state, federal level. I intend to keep that promise, and not for any self-interest, rather to protect state sovereignty and WE THE PEOPLE of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and if you think 1 man cannot make a difference, then you go tell that to Governor Donald Carcieri or David Patchak.

 

What he said....

 

Knowing can be a curse on a person's life. I'd traded in a pack of lies for a pack of truth, and I didn't know which one was heavier. Which one took the most strength to carry around? It was a ridiculous question, though, because once you know the truth, you can't ever go back and pick up your suitcase of lies. Heavier or not, the truth is yours now.”   ― Sue Monk Kidd

 

"you've only got three choices in life...give up, give in, or give it all you got" - Ironman

 - be the change you want to see in the world -

 

The Heart of the Matter

ju·ris·dic·tion: noun: Law The right and power to interpret and apply the law: courts having jurisdiction in this district.   Authority or control: islands under U.S. jurisdiction; a bureau with jurisdiction over Native American affairs;       The territorial range of authority or control.

plan·ta·tion: noun:  a usually large group of plants and especially trees under cultivation; a settlement in a new country or region (Plymouth Plantation)
res·er·va·tion:  noun:  something reserved: as (a): a tract of land set aside (as for use by American Indians).

So Cedric Cromwell has been making some interesting statements regarding his “proof” that the tribe was under federal jurisdiction in 1934.  So far, he had done a fantastic job at showing that the federal government was aware of this tribe’s existence and has used this to say that because of this knowledge, the tribe was under the jurisdiction of the federal government.  Huh…well, the question is not whether or not the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe existed, or if the federal government knew about them….it is whether the tribe was under federal jurisdiction…ie….under the care of the federal government.  The question is were they recognized as their own sovereign government by the United States Federal Government and therefore creating Government assumed obligations to this tribe through treaty. Well the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, or more specifically Cedric Cromwell has been working very hard at trying to prove just that…the tribe claims, as a matter of law, that the tribe was under federal jurisdiction in 1934. 

One claim we have heard over and over is that the tribe had functional treaty relations with Great Britain, which reserved specified tribal rights that the federal government automatically assumed after ceding with the British Crown. They also claim the tribe has continuously exercised aboriginal fishing rights because of this treaty and it is this aboriginal property right that puts them under federal jurisdiction.  Of course they are completely ignoring the fact that aboriginal rights were maintained for the tribe through the State of Massachusetts long before the formation of the federal government.  They have other claims as well which I will write about on another day – for now, let’s start at the beginning and see if we can get to the heart of the matter.

Treaties….let us talk about treaties and the federal removal policy – a policy the tribe claims they were a part of which puts them under federal jurisdiction.  According to the tribe, even though they didn’t actually have a treaty with King George, they did have “treaty relations” which reserved specified tribal rights and the United States succeeded to Great Britain’s obligations, placing the Tribe under federal jurisdiction as a matter of law.

Sigh….first of all – it was the settlement of Massachusetts that honored that treaty.  The United States didn’t even freaking exist at the time.  It was also under this “treaty relation” that Massachusetts gave the Indians aboriginal fishing rights – not the non-existent United States government.  Regarding the lame attempt to show federal jurisdiction under the removal policy where the tribe claims they were considered by the Government, but not removed, which according to them doesn’t matter – the government knew there were tribal members in Mashpee Massachusetts so the tribe MUST be under federal jurisdiction – is a flummoxing  and in my opinion, completely dysfunctional thought process.  That is like saying I am dating someone who refused to go out with me just because I asked…we are dating because he knows I exist….yikes! 

Bottom line is, if you want to know the truth regarding the Indian Removal Act of 1830, then all one needs to do is go read the Congressional Testimony surrounding it…quite an interesting read – the discussion surrounds the creation and subsequent issues of the Cherokee reservation created through a Treaty with the United States in parts of Georgia and North Carolina and…wait for it….treaties with Great Britain!  In a discussion about the Cherokees, they had this to say…

…it would be added, that, at a very early period, the Cherokees formed a treaty with Great Britain, by which they gave up their independence and put themselves under the protection His Britannic Majesty….that this conquest conferred upon the respective states, within whose limits they were, all the rights, and gave them all the powers which the crown had, prior to the revolution. That this right still continued in the States, and never was yielded to the United States. 

It needs to be understood that when Congress was discussing relocating Indian tribes under the Indian Removal Act, they were mainly discussing those Indian Tribes that maintained their identity through self governance, who had a treaty with the federal government and whose land was inside the borders of the original 13 colonies….the Union States. The problem the Mashpee Wampanoag has with their King George “treaty relations” argument is the fact that in the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1783, the treaty that ended the revolutionary war, said treaty extinguished any “treaty relations” with the British Crown.  The first article clearly stated the following:

Acknowledging the United State to be a free, sovereign and independent nation, and that the British Crown and all heirs and successors relinquish claims to the Government, property, and territorial rights of the same, and every part thereof;

You see, during the revolutionary war the colonies realized that they need some form of centralized government so the Articles of Confederation were written and adopted by the Second Continental Congress on November 15, 1777 and was used as the de facto system of government until full ratification on March 1, 1781.  Its greatest achievements were holding the Union together during the American Revolution. 

The next thing that needs to be understood, and what Congress took into consideration during discussions of Indian Removal from the independent States to federal territory west of the Mississippi, was the fact that the Articles of Confederation gave very limited power to the newly formed central government and that those powers were held through ratification of the United States Constitution in 1788.  However, Article Nine of the Articles of Confederation gave the newly formed federal government the power to enter into treaties with Indian tribes…which some tribes did – just not the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe.

Every thing which relates to those Indian Tribes or nations, with which we have political relations, created or regulated by treaties, is becoming every year, more and more interesting; especially those relating to such as reside within any of the States of the Union, or of the territories belonging to it….with this nation, the United States have formed a number of treaties, commencing as early as the year of 1785, and ending the year of 1819.  At the formation of the first, the Indians occupied portions of territory within the chartered limits of the States of North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia…latterly, Georgia, in the exercise she supposes, of her sovereign power, has extended her laws over the whole of the State, and subjected the Indians to her jurisdiction.  Meantime, the Cherokees have formed a civil government of their own, entirely independent of any State, claiming to have right to do so in virtue of their original title to the lands on which they reside, and relying, likewise, upon the guarantee of their country, in several of their treaties formed with the United States.

 It was these treaties with the so named “five civilized tribes” who had formed some sort of government independent of State government that led to the problems of these tribes not wanting to be subject to state law, that they wished to remain independent sovereigns and maintain their own form of government….that and the State of Georgia claimed that that the treaty with the Cherokees was in violation of its sovereignty under the Constitution and the federal government had no power to take the land and give it to the Cherokees without the States consent.  Therefore, the federal government made the case to relocate treaty Indians residing in the original 13 colonies west of the Mississippi, where it did have the power to give land to these tribes and oversee their affairs since they could not exercise their power over a Union State.

To this application the President has replied, that he has no power to check the operation of the laws of those States, within their respective limits; that the Constitution of the United States forbids the formation of any new State within the limits of an old one,  without its consent; therefore, the Cherokees cannot be recognized as a separate State, within those limits where they now reside; and that, if they chose to remain there, they shall be protected in doing so, but that they must submit to the laws of the respective States, at the same time they are protected by them, and earnestly recommends to them to consent to exchange the country where they now reside, for one West of the Mississippi, owned by the United States, and not yet included within the bounds of any State or Territory, where they can be again united and where the United States can, and will, make them forever secure from any interruption from the whites, or from any other nation or people whatever.

It was also for this reason that the non-intercourse act does not apply to Tribes in the original thirteen colonies…

….she (the State) may further insist, that the second article of the Constitution, which gives the President, with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate, power to make treaties, has no application to Indians within the chartered limits of any of the States; nor the eighth section of the first article, which gives Congress power to regulate commerce with the Indian Tribes.  That if Indians can be treated with, it must be those only who reside out of the limits of the States, and those with whom commerce may be regulated, must be similarly situated; otherwise, that part of the second section of the first article, which forbids the enumeration of Indians residing within the States…

They go on to discuss how the States are guaranteed a “republican form of government” and the Federal Government shall protect each of them against invasion, and, on application of the Legislature or of the Executive against domestic violence, and that this would not be attainable unless the majority of the citizens are permitted to prescribe rules to which all must conform.  The question was asked how could the United States guarantee against domestic violence if they permit a portion of the population within her limits to establish a Government, contrary to her will, with authority to prescribe rules inconsistent with those prescribed by herself….that is a damned good question….one that maybe Massachusetts State Governor Deval Patrick would like to answer for us considering, according to the latest and greatest State/Tribal Compact, which has not been approved by anyone…anywhere, as to why he is voluntarily handing over land all over Southeast Massachusetts to a dysfunctional tribe who somehow gained Federal Recognition in 2007 so they can “self-govern” at the expense of the surrounding communities.  AND HE DOESN’T HAVE TO….but he is....HUGS!!

 When you get down to the heart of the matter, you find that is the first article in the Treaty of Paris that really kills any argument that an actual treaty, or even “treaty relations” with King George III were not extinguished – because they were….thus, no federal jurisdiction by default…and no claiming the federal government gave this tribe aboriginal fishing rights placing them under federal jurisdiction…it was the State that preserved their aboriginal fishing rights.  Jeez...they even argued that in a court of law!!

Rights to hunt, fish, and gather have been held by the Wampanoag Native American Indian people of this area from time immemorial, and remain an important aspect of Wampanoag life, providing food, service to the community, and an ingredient of cultural identity. These rights have been acknowledged in law since before the founding of the United States, recognized in treaties, statutes, and judicial decisions of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Appellants Michael Maxim and David Greene, Wampanoag persons, were exercising these rights at the time of their citation by officials of the Town of Bourne for violating a "recreational shellfishing" regulation. [pages 7-9]

So yeah....there was no treaty formed between the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe and the federal government because they had inserted themselves in to the local government of Mashpee, and hence, there was never a reservation in Mashpee – sure, there was a plantation, created by the State honoring said “treaty relations”  for aboriginal fishing rights through the authority of King George…but that is where it ends.

Look, I am not denying that the federal government didn’t know the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe existed…but to go from point A:  the tribe claiming existence  for 12,000 years aaaaallllll the way to point J: jurisdiction -  is really, really reaching here.  There is no doubt that the federal government knew the tribe existed…the federal government went out of its way to understand Indian Tribes and their relations with the Union States in which they resided… and there is no doubt as to the federal government’s view of their “responsibilities” to the tribes in the original thirteen colonies, as it was clearly stated in the 1899 letter from the Commissioner of Indian Affairs regarding Federal Jurisdiction:

These Indians were and their remnants are residents of a section of that portion of the country which constituted the territory of the thirteen original States, as recognized by Great Britain in 1783.  No treaties or agreements were ever made with them by the general government, nor has it ever exercised any supervision or control over them.  Their political status is unknown, but it is presumed that they are citizens and subject to the laws of the several States in which they reside, and entitled to the rights and privileges of such citizenship. 
 
Their political condition is, therefore, radically different from that of what might be termed “plains” Indians, that large body of person in the western section of the county who became subjects or wards of the government with the accession of territory ceded by France in 1803;…All of these “plains” Indians have been at some time or other, in some manner or other, the subject of legislation by the Congress of the United States, and to that extent recognized by the Government…

So this bizarre, King George treaty relationship argument morphing into Federal jurisdiction is really nothing but the desperate attempt of this Tribal Government…no…of Cedric Cromwell…to create a fictitious relationship between the federal government and the Tribe specifically to take land in trust in both Mashpee and Middleboro  Fall River Taunton for gaming under IGRA.  Now you know why. 

The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history - George Orwell

 - be the change you want to see in the world -

 

How not to Win Friends and Influence People

So I woke up this morning to a barrage of commercials from the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe advertising their "federal right" to have a casino in Massachusetts.  The commercials are filled with misleading statements and outright lies....see for yourself...



Yeah....airing commercials that are dishonest and fraudulent specifically to influence State laws surrounding gaming while bullying the Gaming Commission whose job it is to ensure fair execution of this law sure isn't the best way to win friends and influence people.  It just makes you look desperate...which Cedric Cromwell apparently is....nice job Brooke Scannell.  I see your PR company is run with the highest of ethical morals - not. 

Here are two important tips for running a successful, and most importantly, ethical PR campaign. Something the Scannell Group is unable to do.  

1. Always Be Honest. There’s an old Russian proverb that goes: “With lies you may get ahead in the world – but you can never go back.” And that’s just as true when you’re sharing a story with the public. If you present even just one lie in a story, it may possibly help you in the short-term, but there is always a strong chance it can come back to bite you. Not only can you ruin your own credibility as a publicist, and make it hard or even impossible for a media outlet to ever take you seriously again, but also if you’re a notable personality or brand, the negative consequences can be tremendous, as your reputation is always on a pedestal for the public to judge. Although a crisis can always be a possibility when you’re in the limelight, one never wants to help make it an actuality. 

  

2. Don’t Misrepresent Facts. Similar to not lying is not distorting facts to suit one’s needs. Think about it. If you’re a large corporation, should you tell your shareholders your company’s stocks are only worth $5 per share, when they’re really worth $50? Should a doctor tell his or her patient with cancer that most people with their type of cancer live for two years, when in reality they live for only three months? If you twist the facts, you run a major risk in not only destroying your own and the media outlet’s credibility, but you also deceive the public by providing them with incorrect information.

Anyway, Casino Opponents have released a response to these commercials which do follow the above two principles of ethical public relations.  Brooke Scannell could learn a few things about representing facts honestly and ethically from both Allin Frawley and Michelle Taylor Littlefield.  A big and huge THANK YOU to the both of you for your quick response to the trash that is being aired all over Massachusetts.

Casino Opponents both humored and disgusted by Mashpee Wampanoag media blitz

For immediate release
Contact:  Allin Frawley, Vice Chairman, Middleboro Board of Selectmen
                 Michelle Littlefield, Chairman, Preserve Tauton's Future

The community activists and residents of the southeast region are humored by the desperate attempts of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe to bully the Mass Gaming Commission members into retaining their exclusive right to keep Region C held hostage.  However, they are once again disgusted by the tactics, reminiscent of campaigns they have waged in three different communities (Middleboro, Fall River and Taunton) in the past 5 years. The bold faced lies being told in the propaganda they have continually disseminated is quite disturbing.  The facts, supported by evidence submitted by this group to the MGC, Governor Patrick, the Legislature, Department of the Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairs proves the following:

• The tribe was NOT under federal jurisdiction in 1934, as required by the Carcieri SCOTUS decision for a tribe to be granted Land in Trust.
• The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe do not have a federal right to a gaming. They do not have Land in Trust, nor do they meet the criteria under federal policy for Land in Trust, which is a requirement for tribal gaming under IGRA.
• The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe did NOT meet the Pilgrims or celebrate the first Thanksgiving. Evidence of this can be found in their own FINAL DETERMINATION from 2007.
• LIT application continues to remain incomplete, and NOT under federal review. This incomplete application will continue to languish in perpetuity, as was the situation when the tribes 2009 application for lands in Middleboro and Fall River to be put in trust was rejected in January 2012 for being incomplete.
• The tribe has continued to "reservation shop" in clear violation of Federal policy.
• The BIA has never approved a dual initial reservation granting a tribe two initial reservations.
• The BIA, in a letter to the Tribe and Governor Patrick denying the first compact negotiated in 2012, outlined what they deemed would be acceptable in a compact. The compact negotiated in 2013 does NOT meet that criteria.
• Members of the community have retained counsel with the intention of proceeding with legal action should the BIA violate federal policy, further tying up this region for years to come.
• The Tribes efforts to, as they claim, create jobs and economic development, is actually having the opposite effect. They are tying up this region, as well as land in an industrial park and a mall. They are stunting progress in this region and prohibiting legitimate business entities from creating jobs and economic growth. 

The tribe has put forth statements that the Mass Gaming Commission is not accountable to anyone, and has operated with a lack of transparency.  The truth is that those statements accurately describe how the tribe has operated for years, as evidenced by the tribes attempst to block FOIA requests for the tribes incomplete LIT application and Federal District Court cases filed by the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe members in regards to tribal finances, budgets and elections.  

The veiled threats to sue the MGC and blatant threats to game in Region C with no economic benefit to the state are nothing  more than school yard bullying.  Fact remains that they will be defending numerous lawsuits should the federal government over step their authority and place land in trust for this tribe.

- be the change you want to see in the world -